data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98861/98861916c1d849b25609782edd218641046963cc" alt=""
Given how long Brittanica has been around, and given that
anybody can edit Wikipedia, you're expect there to be a bigger difference in their respective accuracies. In a recent blind side-by-side
review of 42 science articles, the difference in accuracy was not particularly great: the average science entry in
Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies;
Britannica, about three. In fact, Wikipedia had more articles than Britannica that were completely defect free. On a per word basis, Wikipedia outperforms Britannica by 3/5. The detailed comparison can be found in table on
this page.
Wikipedia
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home